Yes Green, you have identified a major area of misunderstanding --- actually two major areas of misunderstanding.
Firstly there is the fact that not all keris were created equal.
Then there is the fact that not all creators of keris were equal.
The keris that was created with the intention that it would have some quality that might be able to accessed by its custodian was created by fire and physical force, but with the addition of ritual, and that ritual was not known to every person who could use the forge and its tools.
The man who knew the correct mantras and offerings and days and hours and methods of production that were necessary for the creation of a keris with power was the Empu (Mpu).
This then raises the question of how it might be possible to identify the work of an Mpu.
Hopefully this question will be addressed later.
The word Empu/Mpu should be looked at to understand exactly what this word means. The word exists in Old Javanese, the language that was in general use in Jawa prior to approximately 1600. At that time this word was simply an honorific used to show respect.
However, as the Javanese language developed over time into Modern Javanese, it came to be used as a title for an outstanding craftsman, a literary person, a poet, an artist, or a maker of keris. Since these people were, in Jawa, usually attached to a court, it then became a title that was accompanied by one of the other formal titles bestowed by the court.
In Bahasa Indonesia the word can be understood in several different ways:- master craftsman, armourer, master.
So, if we are looking for a keris that a person who is knowledgeable in keris belief will accept as having the possibility of possessing some sort of power or force or essence that is out of the ordinary, than that keris needs, first & foremost to be able to be identified as the work of a master.
Just because a keris is old, that does not mean that the possibility of an extraordinary nature does exist.
|