Quote:
|
Originally Posted by josh stout
I think these may be a little different type than the ones with the rayskin. The two posted and the one I have are all substantially similar with the solid arched pommel made of layers of copper and steel, horn handle scales, and a slightly shorter blade than the more usual examples of Tibetan utility knives. I thought it was a regional difference, but maybe there is a more specific group of people such knives can be attributed to. The ones I have seen appear to be authentic items for use, but not older than late 20th c.
Josh
|
I would disagree Josh. The only real difference i see between mine with rayskin and Stu's is that Stu has leather instead. The construction of both the knife and the sheath is almost identical. I also think mine is just a little bit older than later 20thC. Maybe early to mid century.
Certainly both mine and Stu's were made for use and show such wear. I agree with Derek that there is a similarity with the Chinese trousse. These seem to be made for similar utility.