Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jim McDougall
...
Just how old is this form known to be? and do the blades vary in shape and of course as suggested here (in this type of metal) in character regionally?
I recall reading some time ago that Magellan was killed in the Philippines by warriors and while some narratives use nebulous terms such as 'scimitar' or 'cutlass' to describe the sword(s) used by them, it seems some accounts use the term 'kampilan'. Since this was in the 16th c. is this just a modern known term for 'sword' in the Philippines, or could this form have been in use that early?
While very much enjoying the beauty of this magnificent example of Charles' I cannot help but wonder more on the form itself.
|
Hi Jim:
Good questions! The
kampilan as a weapon seems to go back some time. As you noted, Magellan is said to have been killed with a sword that some termed a
kampilan.
The famous Maguindanao leader, Sultan Dipatuan Kudarat (CE 1581-1671), is said to have been proficient with a
kampilan and to have been instructed in the use of the
kampilan and
kalis martial arts by Rajah Buayan Silongang. Statues of Sultan Kudarat can be find in Manila and elsewhere in Luzon, and he is renowned widely for his strong leadership and resistance to Spanish influence during his time. All the statues I have seen show him with a
kampilan, consistent with the historical narrative of him using this weapon.
Ian.