Ethnographic Arms & Armour - View Single Post

Pukka Bundook · 15th November 2013, 02:39 AM

I don't really think the pistol in the original post here is of any great age.
All the metalwork looks quite new, "Sharp" even, and has none of the slightly worn appearance seen on arms of the 18th century and earlier.
It appears whoever made it was unfamiliar with construction methods of the 17th/18th century, and wasn't much of a hand at inletting.

Very best wishes,
Richard.

15th November 2013, 02:39 AM	#20
Pukka Bundook Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 803	I don't really think the pistol in the original post here is of any great age. All the metalwork looks quite new, "Sharp" even, and has none of the slightly worn appearance seen on arms of the 18th century and earlier. It appears whoever made it was unfamiliar with construction methods of the 17th/18th century, and wasn't much of a hand at inletting. Very best wishes, Richard.