Ah now I’m laughing. We have similar swords from the end of the 19th c. or from the end of the 20th c.
Not laughing at you Kronkew, and I like your sword as I like mine, and I don’t care if my sword is mid 20th c. But it is important for all the forum members to take what is written here (on this forum) as opinions and just opinions, from collectors and dealers. There is no self-proclaimed experts. Ariel wrote something very right in another thread, I’ll probably quote him about the takouba that I posted one day.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kronckew
The peacock on my sword has the same lettering arched above the head as the royal seal of the Konbaung royal era 1752–1885, I'd thus guess mine was made sometime in that area of time.
Kubur, does yours have a peacock? It's not evident in the photos. If it does, is the lettering similar? Without the peacock, I'd suspect it was somewhat newer.
|
Are you sure, do you have the translation for both inscriptions?
How do you know that the inscription is original from the 19thc. and not memorabilia? I haven’t seen any date mentioned in the post related to your sword.
I sincerely will be very happy if you were right, it will mean that the other assessments about 20th C. were wrong and just based on “feelings”.
I also liked the discussion from Peter about suspension rings and shows that “we” have a lot of cliches in mind.
My sword has no peacock, but it doesn’t mean anything, just the decoration on the grip is different.
But the same hilt, I think - like Ian - that is extremely clear and obvious.
I had the feeling that my sword was 20th c., early 1920-30. Then after Ian /Peter comments I was convinced that my sword was from mid 20thc. Pre 1948.
But after Peter comments (on suspension), I started to think, oh well maybe this sword is old after all…
Now I think that our swords are probably 1920-1950ties.