Ethnographic Arms & Armour - View Single Post

A. G. Maisey · 11th September 2013, 01:19 PM

I'm sorry Auk, but there is nothing more I can say about this keris. The form is unusual, but elements of that unusual form indicate to me an East Jawa origin. It is an old keris, but not immensely old, in your original pics the appearance was vaguely Majapahitish, but in the later pics I can see the material clearly, and I am unable to give it a Mojo label. I doubt that there is much more that anybody could say. I suggest that you should be content with having a nice, unusual , old Javanese keris in fairly good condition.

Frankly, I find it difficult to understand exactly what additional information you need. If you have any specific questions we might be able to provide answers.

11th September 2013, 01:19 PM	#10
A. G. Maisey Member Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 6,703	I'm sorry Auk, but there is nothing more I can say about this keris. The form is unusual, but elements of that unusual form indicate to me an East Jawa origin. It is an old keris, but not immensely old, in your original pics the appearance was vaguely Majapahitish, but in the later pics I can see the material clearly, and I am unable to give it a Mojo label. I doubt that there is much more that anybody could say. I suggest that you should be content with having a nice, unusual , old Javanese keris in fairly good condition. Frankly, I find it difficult to understand exactly what additional information you need. If you have any specific questions we might be able to provide answers.