Ethnographic Arms & Armour - View Single Post

ariel · 22nd February 2010, 09:03 PM

I have my qualms
First, I'd like to see the entire shashka: are the rings on the concave or the convex side of the scabbard? I.e., was it assembled as a shashka or as a saber?
Second, the use of velvet is not typical for Caucasian weapons. Kindjals,- occasionally, but not shashkas.
Third, the upper scabbard fitting is strange: half Kubachi, half plain silver ( Turkish fashion). I have a suspicion that the front panel with Kubachi work was cut off the original and attached to a new base.
Fourth, while I cannot see well the details on the photo, there seems to be a subtle difference in the ornamentation of the handle vs. scabbard. The idea is the same which is not surprising, since the patterns were quite formalized. But the tendrils on the scabbard are more delicate and better executed.
I think, you get my drift....

22nd February 2010, 09:03 PM	#5
ariel Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Ann Arbor, MI Posts: 5,503	I have my qualms First, I'd like to see the entire shashka: are the rings on the concave or the convex side of the scabbard? I.e., was it assembled as a shashka or as a saber? Second, the use of velvet is not typical for Caucasian weapons. Kindjals,- occasionally, but not shashkas. Third, the upper scabbard fitting is strange: half Kubachi, half plain silver ( Turkish fashion). I have a suspicion that the front panel with Kubachi work was cut off the original and attached to a new base. Fourth, while I cannot see well the details on the photo, there seems to be a subtle difference in the ornamentation of the handle vs. scabbard. The idea is the same which is not surprising, since the patterns were quite formalized. But the tendrils on the scabbard are more delicate and better executed. I think, you get my drift....