| 
 
			
			I generally agree with Jussi.
 The one thing I would add is that the rules need to include some information about how you are planning to enforce them.  Your response to my hypothetical was a good one, because it showed how such rules would work in practice.  This could probably be folded under the rubric of "transparency."
 
 As for equality and transparency, that's good.  I think it's also reasonable to ask people to make a minimum commitment, such as a certain number of posts, as part of joining a community of equals who can use the swap forum.  Most communities have entrance requirements, and we're not banning them from posting elsewhere.
 
 Best,
 
 F
 |