Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wolviex
About Tartar's helmet. Again thanks to BI, there is a wide explanation about evolution of these helmets in Mr Gutowski's book. Let me quote for you few sentences:
Jacek Gutowski, Uzbrojenie Tatarow, T. I, Warszawa 1997:
"(...) From the Middle Ages to the 17th cent. the Tartars always used helmets identical in terms of function. They were constructed of somewhat shallow skull-caps, protecting the upper part of the head and flaps protecting the back of and sides of the neck and cheeks. (...) From the end of the 15th cent., due to Caucasian-Turkish influences, the misiurka began to be used - a type of helmet with the skull-cap reduced to a slightly vaulted plate. Misiurka was the most commonly-used helmets of the end of the 16th - end of the 18th cent. Other types did not however disappear entirely. In luxury, richly-decorated helmets, skull caps of early conical and spherical-conical forms appear as late as the end of the 17th cent. In anachronic helmets from the north Caucasus they lasted even to the end of the 18th cent [here is the reference to helmet shown here, then author is describing the way of dating helmets and their ornaments]"
|
I don't really know anything about armor, but:
1. To me it looks like a northern caucasian helmet - AStvatsaturjan 104p. shows fully armored Circassian (year 1830).
2. "Tatar" would suggest Nogai or Kumyk nations, however:
3. Three curling something
is one of the most popular Osethian symbols. Kumyks have something similar, but their three curling something usually has animals - hypogryths and so on.
So - is it Osethian ?