Quote:
Originally Posted by Will M
I would have to agree it is unsuitable for such a purpose. However if used as claimed would result in a slow decapitation process with hacking to the spine. I've butchered enough wild beasties to know what works.
Past ancestors with good intentions developed provenance for some swords. Some are accurate, others in left field. However the story does evoke the mysteries of the past which is most interesting, and who doesn't like a good story?
|
Thank you, Will. I certainly understand your point, although I think we have to be careful about assuming how this weapon would actually have been employed. We simply don’t know the precise manner in which these executions were carried out in Algiers, or whether the technique corresponded at all with the familiar European method of execution by sword.
I would also emphasize that this is a very substantial weapon in the hand. At approximately 58 cm in overall length, photographs don’t adequately convey its mass, rigidity, or chopping capability. Having handled it personally, I can say that it is an extremely formidable cutting weapon. Its geometry may differ from that of a purpose made European executioner’s sword, but that does not mean it would have been incapable of performing the function attributed to it.
More importantly, the claim has never been that this glaive was originally designed as an executioner’s weapon. The surviving account describes an existing weapon that was subsequently repurposed for that function. A repurposed weapon would not necessarily possess the specialized form we associate with weapons manufactured specifically for judicial execution.
I do agree with you on one important point, the story itself deserves scrutiny. That is precisely why I find the piece so interesting and why I am continuing to research the inscription and its provenance rather than simply accepting every element of the account without question. I also intend to have the leather of the scabbard radiocarbon dated, which may help establish a chronological framework for the scabbard itself and provide another piece of evidence to consider alongside the inscription and documented provenance.
At the same time, I don’t think its unconventional form alone is sufficient reason to dismiss the history attached to it. For me, determining how much of that history can be independently substantiated is part of what makes researching this piece so fascinating.