Quote:
Originally Posted by A. G. Maisey
Detlef, I have no opinion in respect of who might have put it together, none at all, for the simple reason that i have absolutely nothing upon which to base that opinion. To form an opinion, I need evidence, I have none.
However, I do have a picture, & that picture tells me that I'm looking at something that has three or four parts that I have never previously seen combined in a single item.
The blade can be recognised & named, the hilt can be recognised & named, the scabbard appears to have some age and could well have been made for the blade, but can all these parts , assembled as one, be named? To give a name we need a whole group of similar objects that do have a name & a supportable geographic location of origin.
We do not have this.
Then there is the problem of how this implement could be used.
I doubt I would want to use it for anything unless I was wearing a metal mesh glove.
|
Hello Alan,
There we are again by the name game!
I haven't given it a name, I just wrote that I would place it to the kerambit family, you said with other words the same. It's just my feeling that someone in the Palembang area has created a personal dagger for self defense. It's a unique piece for sure, like you I never have seen a similar piece before! How it can be used is difficult to say without handling it in person. And I wouldn't mind to add it to my collection!
Regards,
Detlef