View Single Post
Old Today, 09:59 AM   #11
midelburgo
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim McDougall View Post
This really is an interesting topic, and in support of what Midelburgo suggests, toward the case of Spanish naval fleets, from William Gilkerson (1991, "Boarders Away" p.19) ,
"...fleets were commanded largely by soldiers, and its ships were equipped largely with land service small arms right into the 19th c. Hence, while the Spanish navy was hugely important to the geopolitics of the period and to the maintenance of the Spanish colonial empire, its weaponry was as obsolete as its organization. Indeed in all the vast chambers of Madrid's Museo Navale, it is difficult to find a small arm of specifically naval origin from the period of our study".

An example of the form of French hanger is found in "Swords and Blades of the American Revolution", George Neumann, 1973, p.79, 54.S.
It is captioned as c. 1725-50 brass hilt, blade 27 3/4" single or double edge straight, and for French grenadiers.

As noted, with lack of foundries for brass work and of course munitions grade arms, during the War of Spanish Succession with France allied with Castilian Spain it seems reasonable that St.Etienne weapons would be supplied.
While Nuemann suggests the 1725 as the terminus post quem for the 'pattern' it is likely these were around notably prior.

With Spanish soldiers aboard vessels, these munitions grade weapons as seen were certainly not unusual though not specifically 'naval'. The examples of rapiers typically deemed 'Caribbean; versions of the more refined Spanish cuphilts, were probably used by officers in command of these military units which were aboard these vessels. They may have been produced in the colonial ports or by armorers in the ports in the Peninsula.
I am currently discovering many a publication that has taken place from the academic side in recent years. All the burocratic account are there, but very few used them until now. This is giving a new image.

Spain had a huge utilitarian weapon production. It is similar to what happened with the iron cannon from La Cavada ironworks. Those guns are everywhere across America fortifications. They were cheap, ugly and unmarked. And functioned well when their carriages were not rotten and their crews were paid.

In relation with the ARRIVILLAGA cavalry sword. Tolosa produced 1500-2000 swords a month for a century. We are used (I was at least) to think of a dominating Toledo production that declined in the second half of XVII century, then was substituted by Solingen production, until the new Toledo factory restarted in 1761. But now it seems it was more complex.

A Royal Factory was stablished in 1596 in Eugui, near Pamplona with a couple of dozens of Milan armourers, swordsmiths and cannonball founders.

Armour making and swordsmithy, (and the surviving milanese and their descendance) were moved to Tolosa in 1630. Nearby Plasencia made some 20000 muskets a year. With the Louis XIV wars their activity increased.

In the war of the Spanish sucession, a weaponry center was expanded in Cataluņa, swords in Barcelona, using Austrian models, and including brass foundry.

For the Felipe V faction about 25-30% of the weapon needs were suplied by the French (those solid brass hilts were made up to 1730).

In 1715, just after the war finished, Felipe V started planning the recovery of the lost possesions in Italy, so the Barcelona weapon making center was expanded.

For a while both centers continued producing weaponry at full speed. Swords could have their blades made in Tolosa or Barcelona. If the hilts were iron they were made in Durango. If brass, in Barcelona. The French weapons from the war, were slowly recicled.

Somehow, Tolosa stopped working as a Royal Factory in 1721. Then they had the asiento system for a while. I suspect the ARRIVILLAGA swords belong to a contract from 1734. But this did not worked well.

Solingen contracts filled the gaps when Barcelona of Tolosa were not enough.

Toledo started producing blades in 1761, but it was secondary to Barcelona, at least until the new building was made in 1781. Brass hilts were made in Barcelona and moved to Toledo. Iron hilts continued being made in Durango.

As the Toledo Royal Factory started winning track, Barcelona was given less and less asiento contracts. Tolosa was completely forgotten by then, although Eibar started making hilts (brass and iron) in the 1790s and blades in 1815.
midelburgo is offline   Reply With Quote