Marius, 
 You are absolutely correct: the blades are unmistakeably S. Indian. 
This strengthens the argument that  the handles were a later modification. 
 So, should we stop calling them Indo-Afghani? 
Probably not: the modifications on many of them were of Afghani styles. By the same logic, Persian and purely Indian blades are in fact “( Something)- Afghani”,  we just need to look separately on different components of a given sword. 
I may show some swords that, in my estimation are purely Afghani based on both  handle and blade. 
 
 Handles are simple: pulwar-like are unmistakeable. 
 
Can we start describing features of a genuinely Afghani blade? 
 
Let’s open the floodgates! Go on!
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 |