View Single Post
Old 6th September 2005, 02:00 PM   #16
kai
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alam Shah
I guess, smaller blade is easier to conceal and use, for women (or men), in close quarters engagement. That's what patrems are for.
Yup, that's why I compared it to a Moro gunong.

However, I still don't see why it would be preferable (from a functional POV) to "smooth out" the originally broader luk since the total width of the blade doesn't seem limiting to me. If a more slender blade is the main goal, just grind off both edges equally (following the pamor) and, thus, preserve the original shape/proportions. So, is the actually seen change of blade proportions/design some sort of traditional dapur "requirement" for keris Jawa? Of course, it's much easier to rework a pamor mlumah (tiban) blade but I have problems to imagine that a bladesmith would compromise a nice pamor miring for anything but a very good reason... Any ideas?

Regards,
Kai
kai is offline   Reply With Quote