|  21st November 2010, 11:43 AM | #5 | 
	| Member 
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Germany, Dortmund 
					Posts: 9,409
				      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by kai
					
				 Examples of this pommel style which were obviously original never show a distinct beak (i. e. both, beak and crest, heavily stylized). Since Detlef's examples has a distinct beak and also the flow of lines where the crest could have been seems to be unusual, I'd guess that the original pommel got recarved a long time ago.
 Regards,
 Kai
 |  Agree that the beak is longer/distinct as the other examples are shown, so you maybe right by your guess.     
Regards,
 
Detlef
		 | 
	|   |   |