Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Royston
Hello Imas
It has some faults, but I would still recomend Stone's Glossary.
Regards
Roy
|
Excellent call Roy! I've gotten so used to having that as a standard that I forget to mention it
Although written in 1930s , it serves as the spine of any library on serious arms study, and certainly has flaws from nearly 8 decades of new findings and subsequent research....but essential benchmark just the same.