![]() |
American foot artillery sword?
3 Attachment(s)
An inquiry received in my e-mail:
Quote:
|
The eagle on the pommel looks French to me. The American (both north and south) version of this piece as you know was based on the French model.
|
Wouldn't a French 1816 sword have a rooster and not eagle and those 1816s with none have had their fluer de lis rubbed off?
Add that this has a shield on its breast? Cheers GC |
I am not sure what the '3' refers to, but this seems very much a M1832 Ames type foot artillery sword. The eagle is the same and the shield of course aligns with the federal period motifs in the U.S.
The French 1816 and 1831 'cabbage choppers' as far as Ive known had smooth pommels and the 1831 had ringed grips rather than 'feathered'. These swords were of course pretty ineffective as weapons but served well in utility for clearing brush etc in artllery emplacements. As always, these would have served in degree as required if overrun, but there were honestly relatively few sword injuries recorded in the Civil War, and the likelihood of use of these improbable as far as combat use. |
glaive 1816
hello there
in my opinion is a variante du sabre d'artillerie 1816 produit par l'industrie privee pour la garde national pariseinne the blade suppose have no proof reference " des sabre et des epee par michel petard" regard jacques |
2 Attachment(s)
There are certainly cockerel emblazoned 1816 variants up to the second empire. As mentioned, early ones had the fluer de lis scraped off after the first empire.
An example of those noted by Jean Binck (no photo) The sword on the right is probably a privately purchased variation of the French artillery gladius Model 1816. The rooster on the pommel allows to date it between 1830 and 1848. This kind of privately purchased fancy pattern was in use in the French National Guard There are also some anomalies with the American assemblies, with the same eagle but peened rather than riveted. Attached below. Also keep in mind that the IOOF loved the Ames 1832 and there is no reason not to consider what we are seeing here is a lodge sword or other, as the later degree swords continued the gladius form up into the 20th century with make ups such as the really plain blades and bullseye pommels. One could even blame Bannerman for this one. Cheers GC |
3 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
:rolleyes: |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.