Ethnographic Arms & Armour

Ethnographic Arms & Armour (http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/index.php)
-   History of Steel Working Group (http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Section Organization Ideas (http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=1501)

Mark 17th November 2005 09:34 PM

Section Organization Ideas
 
Use this thread to throw out ideas specifically about how the display could be arranged/organized, and for related discussion. Don't post here about individual pieces, but rather about the broader themes and structure for the Section.

Before posting here, however, please read my Welcome post up at the top of the forum, including the instructions page linked in it near the bottom. Also read Antonio's welcoming remarks and Mission Statement here.

Federico 17th November 2005 11:25 PM

Copied and pasted from my other post to here.

Given the diversity and the limits of our collections, I propose a simple regionalization of weaponry via the 3 major land areas of PI, Northern, Central, and Southern. From there we can try to develop sub-sets as best we can (eg. lumad vs moro, christian vs non christian, western visayas vs eastern visayas, etc...) as we determine the actual pieces to be contributed. However, I would like to (for the purposes of the article) stay as general as possible, dividing only as pieces are available (eg. if all the central region pieces are from Panay, then no need to divide Visayas further). I do not feel we can get a proper idea of how to organize the section more specifically until we get a better idea of what pieces can be contributed.

Antonio Cejunior 18th November 2005 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Federico
Copied and pasted from my other post to here.

Given the diversity and the limits of our collections, I propose a simple regionalization of weaponry via the 3 major land areas of PI, Northern, Central, and Southern. From there we can try to develop sub-sets as best we can (eg. lumad vs moro, christian vs non christian, western visayas vs eastern visayas, etc...) as we determine the actual pieces to be contributed. However, I would like to (for the purposes of the article) stay as general as possible, dividing only as pieces are available (eg. if all the central region pieces are from Panay, then no need to divide Visayas further). I do not feel we can get a proper idea of how to organize the section more specifically until we get a better idea of what pieces can be contributed.

Agreed in general IMHO Fred :)

1 Speaking of display and cataloguing the specimens, should we have Kris from North, Center and Southern regions all together, right? This way we are contemplating both the Type and Regional modes. Same for Bolo, etc.

2 I feel that the article should cover (in general mode) the entirety in a balance between what is on display and what is not. It is a rare opportunity to have it printed. But this is just a non specialist speaking out of mere intuition of what I would like to be reading as part of the public.

Please correct me if I am wrong :)

Oh the pictures, if you are willing to send the old books we will scan and return immediately. ;)
Thanks

Mark 4th January 2007 06:39 PM

bump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.