Ethnographic Arms & Armour

Ethnographic Arms & Armour (http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/index.php)
-   Keris Warung Kopi (http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   What do I have? (http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=13331)

BBJW 13th February 2011 06:52 PM

What do I have?
 
5 Attachment(s)
I just picked this up. These are not in my sphere of collecting. What do I have? Scabbard is dated 1946 with some Arabic script under it.

Cheers
bbjw

Jussi M. 13th February 2011 10:50 PM

Umm, a keris???

Sorry, could not resist myself :p

Unfortunately I am no well versed enough to tag it but I do like it.

So, what are we looking at here folks?

Thanks,

J.

Rick 14th February 2011 02:33 AM

C'mon ....

Take a guess Jussi . :)

Jussi M. 14th February 2011 05:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rick
C'mon ....

Take a guess Jussi . :)

Ok... It is a... nice keris???

Yes! :D

OK... I really am guessing here so take the following suggestion as that: I see a Yogyakarta dressed Javanese keris Betok.

Thanks,

J.

David 14th February 2011 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jussi M.
OK... I really am guessing here so take the following suggestion as that: I see a Yogyakarta dressed Javanese keris Betok.

I don't this this is a keris betok.... :shrug:

Rick 14th February 2011 07:41 PM

Might this be a kebo lajer ? :confused:



In Yogya dress . ;)

BBJW 14th February 2011 07:57 PM

Seriously
 
Nobody cares to be serious here? Terrific.

bbjw

Jussi M. 14th February 2011 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBJW
Nobody cares to be serious here? Terrific.

bbjw

A little humor goes a long way. As of my bet I probably got it (read did get it) wrong and Rick most probably got it right. Them Kerises are not - to include most people frequenting this place myself very much included - necessarily easy to tag compared in contrast to many other forms of ethnographic bladed weaponry.

Sorry If I offended some how. That I assure you was not my purpose.

What ever this keris might be labeled as it is a nice one. Thatīs what counts.

Thanks,

J.

A. G. Maisey 14th February 2011 08:41 PM

BBJW, I can be very serious, and if you feel that you would prefer this approach, I can provide it. However, I almost never adopt this posture, because it frequently offends.

The people who have contributed to this thread have done so in a relaxed way, and probably have acted so because they like the ongoing conversation.

Be patient. You'll get what you want eventually, and it will be provided without my rough edges.

VANDOO 14th February 2011 09:11 PM

I AM NOT KNOWLEGABLE ENOUGH TO GUESS BUT WOULD LIKE TO SEE A GOOD CLOSE UP OF THE DESIGN AND WRITEING ON THE SCABBARD. IT MAY GIVE SOME VALUABLE IDENTIFICATION AS TO WHERE IT COMES FROM AND ITS HISTORY. SOME CLOSEUPS OF THE BLADE WOULD HELP ID PARMOR, AGE AND COUNTRY OF ORIGIN.
EVEN THE EXPERTS CAN'T DO MUCH WHEN WORKING IN THE DARK. GOOD LUCK :)

David 14th February 2011 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBJW
Nobody cares to be serious here? Terrific.

bbjw

Actually, aside from some opening kidding you have indeed had a couple of serious answers, though i believe one was incorrect and suggested as much.
So far the Yogyakarta dress part is correct, and the sheath is Ladrang, which is the formal dress.
The gandik does seem a tad on the long size so Rick may well be correct to call this dhapur kebo lajer, though it doesn't seem as overtly long as many kebo keris i have seen.
The blade is out of stain so it is hard to name the pamor based on these photos, but it could be a standard "scattered rice" (wos wutah) pattern. Looks like average village work to me.
Maybe if you made you questions more specific you would receive more specific answers.
Better, closer images might tell more. What exactly do you want to know?
:)

Rick 15th February 2011 02:28 AM

I would add that being village work (this is not a bad thing necessarily) .......... Sometimes the smith's intent of the dhapur form can be interpreted in more than one way; that's why I followed my guess with a question mark .

More, I cannot answer . :shrug:

David 15th February 2011 03:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rick
I would add that being village work (this is not a bad thing necessarily) .......... Sometimes the smith's intent of the dhapur form can be interpreted in more than one way; that's why I followed my guess with a question mark .

More, I cannot answer . :shrug:

Not at all Rick, i like village work...It accounts for the vast majority of my collection... :)
...and i'm not counting out your guess as a possibility...

David 15th February 2011 12:31 PM

Forgive me BBJW, but isn't this the same keris that you posted back in 2007? :confused:
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=4158

Sajen 15th February 2011 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David
Forgive me BBJW, but isn't this the same keris that you posted back in 2007? :confused:
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=4158

It is the same keris when my eyes not morbid. :D
And BBJW get a very comprehensive answer from Alan G. Maisey. But BBJW may want to know more? :shrug: Maybe he can specify his question.

BBJW 15th February 2011 04:55 PM

Cleaning house
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by David
Forgive me BBJW, but isn't this the same keris that you posted back in 2007? :confused:
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=4158

Yes it is and I forgot to put a tag on it. I didn't mean to imply that I recently purchased this. I was just getting pieces ready to sell that I have picked up over the years that don't really interest me and still couldn't pass up at the time. Collecting can be a disease!

Thanx
bbjw

David 15th February 2011 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BBJW
Collecting can be a disease!

What do you mean, CAN be? :D


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.