Ethnographic Arms & Armour

Ethnographic Arms & Armour (http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/index.php)
-   European Armoury (http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   German Hunting swords , thoughts and facts (http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=28734)

Akanthus 29th March 2023 08:45 PM

German Hunting swords , thoughts and facts
 
9 Attachment(s)
I would like to attemp a short summary about facts and thoughts regarding German huntingswords of the 17.th century.Any friendly comments are welcome.
If you look around in museums,collections and auction catalogues,you will often find huntingswords there.However,if you are looking for 17.th century pieces these a rather rare,as the vast majority comes from the 18.th and 19.th century.
But what are the characteristic features of a German huntingsword of the 17.th century and how and why was it used ?
The direct line of ancestors runs from the Germanic seax to the „ Hauswehr" ,an all purpose tool that could be found in almost every house of those times.A medium-length knife,that was used for work,defense and hunting.Than ,step by step,in the 17.th century a weapon emerges,that can ultimately be characterized as primarily for hunting use, the huntingsword.
Usually the blades are single-edged,rather inflexible,50 to 60 cm in length,without ricasso and with or without fullers.The blades have a variety of decorations,such as deers,wildboars or even hares.Rather simple pieces don't have any decor.According to Döbel and v. Heppe,backblades were used,so that the dogs that grabbed the game ,could not be injured so easily.Frevert says the tip should not be too pointed ( Knochengierig) ,to avoid the blade getting stuck in the bone of the game
The hilts of the early pieces are made from iron.There is a crossguard and a knucklebow connected to it, which is about half,three quaters or full length of the grip.The knucklebow either ends freely or has a connection to the grip.Ironcut decorations are often found, depending on rank,name or the financial possibilities of the owner.
To increase the torsion stability from blade and hilt,the crossguard is often perforated by the blade,so that you can see the blade through a recess in the crossguard.( Pic.2) Welded ferrules also hold the blade.
Shell-shaped guardplates are often found,which are usually bent towards the blade.The guardplates are almost always welded or riveted ( Pic.3 ) to the crossguard.The later form of guardplate attach ment,using a ring on the guardplate that is pushed over the tang( Pic.4)is rare in the early times,but common in the 18.th century.
The tang of the blades is formed flat and griplike and the gripplates are fixed to the tang by hollow rivets ( Pic.5) These are filled with a small piece of wood and decorationnails are fixed there.So from the side you can see the handle-shaped tang between the gripplates.( Pic.6) In Germany you call this „Heftmontage".Another way to fix a grip to the tang ( Angelmontage),is less common in the early times.Here you put the grip over a narrow tang.The end of the grip often looks like a stylized bird's head,with it's „ beak" towards the knucklebow( Pic.7+8).
But why did huntsmen develop these weapons in the 17.th century ? Surely it's caused by the changed hunting techniques.In addition to the „Hatz" ,where the game was hunted from horseback with dogs,the enclosed hunt ( Eingestelltes Jagen) developed.(Pic.9 ).Here a lot of game was captured in an area ,which was fenced by high rags.The game was killed by a group of hunters in close combat. In the confined space and in the general confusion,the use of firearms was dangerous.This resulted in the need for a shorter,less unwieldy weapon in comparison to the pigsword( Sauschwert).Also the boarfeather ( Saufeder) was used here.Interestingly,on the wonderful pictures painted by Valentin Wagner in 1633 on the occasion of a boar hunt by Landgraf Georg II.von Hessen Darmstadt,you can also see hunters with non -hunting edged weapons participating the hunt.( Pic.10) In addition to it's hunting use ,the hunting sword was also used in cases of selfdefence in those uncertain times.Last but not least it was a symbol of honor for the hunter and was ceremoniously handed over and allowed to carrie only after a education of several years, concerning hunting skills and rules.
Something else about German nomenclature :
The weapon of the 17.th century i have referred to is called „Jagddegen“ in German.The heavy huntingsword ( Jagdschwert) is the weapon of the mounted hunter of the 16.th century.The „ Hirschfänger" is the huntingweapon of the 18,th century.Seifert, the grandseigneur of edged weapons says : „ The „ Jagddegen" is a short „ Jagdschwert" or a long „ Hirschfänger“.
For me the huntingswords of the 17.th century are fascinating ,because they have a heavy and stabile appearance.They seem to be a combination of tool and weapon and are made for rough hunting use.Later forms of hunting weapons are changing more and more to status symbols ,rank signs and costume decorations. This should not exclude their hunting use in many cases.
Thanks to Jens,that i was allowed to take pictures from some of his great huntingswords.
Literature :
- Gerhard Seifert, Der Hirschfänger,1973
- Herbert H. Westphal, Hirschfänger,Zur historischen Entwicklung jagdlicher Seitenwaffen
- Frevert Walter,Das jagdliche Brauchtum
- Döbel,Jägerpractica, 1746
- V.Heppe,Aufrichtiger Lehrprinz oder Praktische Abhandlung von dem Leithund ,1751
- Niddaer Sauhatz von 1633

Akanthus 29th March 2023 09:36 PM

Gernan hunting swords .Facts and thoughts
 
1 Attachment(s)
Sorry,i forgot to show Pic.5

Jim McDougall 30th March 2023 03:57 AM

3 Attachment(s)
Very interesting topic. While the 'hunting sword' is of course presumed for use obviously in the 'hunt' many of these often transcend this specific designation into other use and intent. However as seen in references such as "Catalog of European Court Swords and Hunting Swords" (Bashford Dean, 1929) these types of swords are closely related in many cases.

The hunt was the tradition and pastime of the elite from nobility to high gentry and fashion was of course of the highest order, with weapons most important .
The styling of the elements of the hunting sword was of course often more 'rustic' than the typical highly embellished court sword, but still the styling was made to impress.

This example I have is clearly with the elements of stag horn and features similar to these shown, and carrying traditional conventions of style since the previous century. The monogram on the blade is the CT of Carl Theodor (1724-1799), Charles IV Elector of Palentina and Duke of Juelich-Berg from 1742 to 1777.

What is interesting here is the profoundly notable yataghan style blade. In the War of the Austrian Succession (1740-1748), there were various supporting forces for Maria Theresa and the Habsburg Empire. These included units of Pandurs, auxiliary forces who favored oriental fashion and weapons such as the yataghan. Many of these were volunteers from Slovenia (Croatia) and other Balkan and East European regions.

It is possible this may have been such a sword, but the point is, the hunting sword in many cases was found employed in other uses.

M ELEY 30th March 2023 05:05 AM

Awesome collection of early hunting swords! Your research is very thorough! Not much to add but did want to point out (as Jim already did!) that many of these 'hanger' types also found their way into use by infantry and naval connections. The short, stout blades were ideal aboard the decks of very (over) crowded ships and it has even been said that the serrated blades originally meant for trussing game could be used to serrate rope, slash away fallen sails, etc. Likewise, many of these courtly swords were a show of prestige amongst naval officers.

Interested Party 30th March 2023 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Akanthus (Post 280907)
The tang of the blades is formed flat and griplike and the gripplates are fixed to the tang by hollow rivets ( Pic.5) These are filled with a small piece of wood and decorationnails are fixed there.So from the side you can see the handle-shaped tang between the gripplates.( Pic.6) In Germany you call this „Heftmontage".Another way to fix a grip to the tang ( Angelmontage),is less common in the early times.Here you put the grip over a narrow tang.The end of the grip often looks like a stylized bird's head,with it's „ beak" towards the knucklebow( Pic.7+8).

Does this tang mean that within the German Guild system that these were made by a knife maker like the langes messer, not by a sword smith?

awdaniec666 30th March 2023 03:08 PM

2 Attachment(s)
Very interesting information Akanthus!
I always wondered if there is any specific reason for hunting swords to have defensive elements (guards) on them with obviously more function than preventing a slipping of the hand towards the blade. Do you know something in this direction?

I also have a hunting sword or hanger in my collection which seems to be later (late 18th century ?). Feel free to comment on this because I´m unable to determine its age and origin!

werecow 30th March 2023 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Interested Party (Post 280933)
Does this tang mean that within the German Guild system that these were made by a knife maker like the langes messer, not by a sword smith?

They certainly have a lot in common. Not just the tang and riveted grip plates, but the presence of a nagel-like hand protection riveted to the guard, and general shape of the grip.

Akanthus 30th March 2023 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Interested Party (Post 280933)
Does this tang mean that within the German Guild system that these were made by a knife maker like the langes messer, not by a sword smith?

I don't think that the way of grip attachment gives a clou to the manufacturer.The " Heftmontage " predominates in the first half of the 17.th century .Later ,up to the 18.th century the " Angelmontage " prevails.Certainly also a question of fashion and area of the smith.In those times arises a spezification of craftsmen.One group made the blades ,another did finish and sharp them,others made the grips and connected them with the blade.But certainly there were skilled blacksmiths outside the centers of weapon builders which were able to built a complete weapon with their own hands.

Akanthus 30th March 2023 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by awdaniec666 (Post 280935)
Very interesting information Akanthus!
I always wondered if there is any specific reason for hunting swords to have defensive elements (guards) on them with obviously more function than preventing a slipping of the hand towards the blade. Do you know something in this direction?

I also have a hunting sword or hanger in my collection which seems to be later (late 18th century ?). Feel free to comment on this because I´m unable to determine its age and origin!

I think that the guard plate has primarily the function of a hand protection from blows
by the game but also from hostile blades during a fight.On the other hand it protects the tools in the scabbard from getting lost .
I would agree that your very nice weapon has to be dated to the second half of the 18.th century .I would say England or France, not Germany . Possibly it is used as a hanger and had a naval history.

Jim McDougall 31st March 2023 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by M ELEY (Post 280928)
Awesome collection of early hunting swords! Your research is very thorough! Not much to add but did want to point out (as Jim already did!) that many of these 'hanger' types also found their way into use by infantry and naval connections. The short, stout blades were ideal aboard the decks of very (over) crowded ships and it has even been said that the serrated blades originally meant for trussing game could be used to serrate rope, slash away fallen sails, etc. Likewise, many of these courtly swords were a show of prestige amongst naval officers.

Thank you for acknowledging my post Capn! As you have pointed out, the fact that these swords, while generally deemed 'hunting' weapons, also served in other capacity as required. This is most feasibly the reason that defensive guards were often present, despite the typical utilitarian connotation .

Teisani 1st April 2023 07:40 PM

2 Attachment(s)
This hunting sword hilt reminds me a bit of IX.634 from the Royal Armouries.
https://collections.royalarmouries.o...bject-120.html

Akanthus 2nd April 2023 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Teisani (Post 280997)
This hunting sword hilt reminds me a bit of IX.634 from the Royal Armouries.
https://collections.royalarmouries.o...bject-120.html

Thank you.Very interesting......

Jim McDougall 2nd April 2023 02:55 PM

Yes, most interesting I agree.

PhDBrewer 2nd May 2023 05:21 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Great write up!
Howard Backmore writes about cabbalistic writings that possess some "mystical quality to spur him on to greater deeds or bring him luck". I find the blade markings quite interesting.
Here is an example from an early 18th century Hirschfänger.
William

Akanthus 2nd May 2023 03:58 PM

8 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by PhDBrewer (Post 281643)
Great write up!
Howard Backmore writes about cabbalistic writings that possess some "mystical quality to spur him on to greater deeds or bring him luck". I find the blade markings quite interesting.
Here is an example from an early 18th century Hirschfänger.
William

Yes,there are wonderful decorations on huntingsword blades.Often game,like stags,wildboars,bears but also hares.On some you find little poems spending luck.Also floral decor is loved.

corrado26 2nd May 2023 06:01 PM

Der Jäger hat allezeit Verlangen, mit wenig Mühe viel zu fangen = The hunter always desires to catch much which little effort.

Rick 2nd May 2023 08:53 PM

The images of these 'hunting enclosures' are fascinating; I had no idea they were used.

urbanspaceman 2nd May 2023 09:40 PM

Sea service
 
3 Attachment(s)
Jim will recognise this piece and I have to agree with his suggestion that it was a sea-service weapon.
The weight of the blade however, and its thickness, does lend it to hacking at animal limbs rather than sailors: it is four centimeters wide at the hilt and half a centimeter thick with a blade length of fifty centimeters. Anyone have ten cents worth?

Akanthus 2nd May 2023 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rick (Post 281666)
The images of these 'hunting enclosures' are fascinating; I had no idea they were used.

These enclosed hunts startet in the 16th.century and spread over Germany as a hunting technique of the noble upperclass.The game was driven together in a huge area and in the end there were lots of animals gathered in a rag fenced place. ( Kammer = Chamber ). From here it was driven into the "Lauf " ,another fenced place ,where the hunters waited to kill the game by rifles or huntingswords.These hunts mostly took several days from starting to gather the game until the festive end.Lots of serfs had to do the work for the noble amusement. Some hunting traditions survived until present times.It seems up to the beginning of the 20th.century till this hunting technique was finally forbidden and branded as unsportsmanlike ( unwaidmännisch )

Akanthus 2nd May 2023 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by urbanspaceman (Post 281669)
Jim will recognise this piece and I have to agree with his suggestion that it was a sea-service weapon.
The weight of the blade however, and its thickness, does lend it to hacking at animal limbs rather than sailors: it is four centimeters wide at the hilt and half a centimeter thick with a blade length of fifty centimeters. Anyone have ten cents worth?

This certainly is a fighting weapon not a hunting sword.In the German typology you would call,it "Jaglich gefasst" .It means, that it looks like a hunting sword ( stag horn grip) but it isn't one.In the 18th. and 19th.century it began to become modern to carry huntingweaponlike sidearms in spite not beeing a hunter.I think that in countrys, which a rich naval history ( England ,France,Spain,Portugal etc.)these wepons were often found on the decks of a ship,because they were practical of their relatively shortness .

Akanthus 2nd May 2023 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by corrado26 (Post 281663)
Der Jäger hat allezeit Verlangen, mit wenig Mühe viel zu fangen = The hunter always desires to catch much which little effort.

Right !!!!!!

Akanthus 9th May 2023 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Akanthus (Post 280907)
I would like to attemp a short summary about facts and thoughts regarding German huntingswords of the 17.th century.Any friendly comments are welcome.
If you look around in museums,collections and auction catalogues,you will often find huntingswords there.However,if you are looking for 17.th century pieces these a rather rare,as the vast majority comes from the 18.th and 19.th century.
But what are the characteristic features of a German huntingsword of the 17.th century and how and why was it used ?
The direct line of ancestors runs from the Germanic seax to the „ Hauswehr" ,an all purpose tool that could be found in almost every house of those times.A medium-length knife,that was used for work,defense and hunting.Than ,step by step,in the 17.th century a weapon emerges,that can ultimately be characterized as primarily for hunting use, the huntingsword.
Usually the blades are single-edged,rather inflexible,50 to 60 cm in length,without ricasso and with or without fullers.The blades have a variety of decorations,such as deers,wildboars or even hares.Rather simple pieces don't have any decor.According to Döbel and v. Heppe,backblades were used,so that the dogs that grabbed the game ,could not be injured so easily.Frevert says the tip should not be too pointed ( Knochengierig) ,to avoid the blade getting stuck in the bone of the game
The hilts of the early pieces are made from iron.There is a crossguard and a knucklebow connected to it, which is about half,three quaters or full length of the grip.The knucklebow either ends freely or has a connection to the grip.Ironcut decorations are often found, depending on rank,name or the financial possibilities of the owner.
To increase the torsion stability from blade and hilt,the crossguard is often perforated by the blade,so that you can see the blade through a recess in the crossguard.( Pic.2) Welded ferrules also hold the blade.
Shell-shaped guardplates are often found,which are usually bent towards the blade.The guardplates are almost always welded or riveted ( Pic.3 ) to the crossguard.The later form of guardplate attach ment,using a ring on the guardplate that is pushed over the tang( Pic.4)is rare in the early times,but common in the 18.th century.
The tang of the blades is formed flat and griplike and the gripplates are fixed to the tang by hollow rivets ( Pic.5) These are filled with a small piece of wood and decorationnails are fixed there.So from the side you can see the handle-shaped tang between the gripplates.( Pic.6) In Germany you call this „Heftmontage".Another way to fix a grip to the tang ( Angelmontage),is less common in the early times.Here you put the grip over a narrow tang.The end of the grip often looks like a stylized bird's head,with it's „ beak" towards the knucklebow( Pic.7+8).
But why did huntsmen develop these weapons in the 17.th century ? Surely it's caused by the changed hunting techniques.In addition to the „Hatz" ,where the game was hunted from horseback with dogs,the enclosed hunt ( Eingestelltes Jagen) developed.(Pic.9 ).Here a lot of game was captured in an area ,which was fenced by high rags.The game was killed by a group of hunters in close combat. In the confined space and in the general confusion,the use of firearms was dangerous.This resulted in the need for a shorter,less unwieldy weapon in comparison to the pigsword( Sauschwert).Also the boarfeather ( Saufeder) was used here.Interestingly,on the wonderful pictures painted by Valentin Wagner in 1633 on the occasion of a boar hunt by Landgraf Georg II.von Hessen Darmstadt,you can also see hunters with non -hunting edged weapons participating the hunt.( Pic.10) In addition to it's hunting use ,the hunting sword was also used in cases of selfdefence in those uncertain times.Last but not least it was a symbol of honor for the hunter and was ceremoniously handed over and allowed to carrie only after a education of several years, concerning hunting skills and rules.
Something else about German nomenclature :
The weapon of the 17.th century i have referred to is called „Jagddegen“ in German.The heavy huntingsword ( Jagdschwert) is the weapon of the mounted hunter of the 16.th century.The „ Hirschfänger" is the huntingweapon of the 18,th century.Seifert, the grandseigneur of edged weapons says : „ The „ Jagddegen" is a short „ Jagdschwert" or a long „ Hirschfänger“.
For me the huntingswords of the 17.th century are fascinating ,because they have a heavy and stabile appearance.They seem to be a combination of tool and weapon and are made for rough hunting use.Later forms of hunting weapons are changing more and more to status symbols ,rank signs and costume decorations. This should not exclude their hunting use in many cases.
Thanks to Jens,that i was allowed to take pictures from some of his great huntingswords.
Literature :
- Gerhard Seifert, Der Hirschfänger,1973
- Herbert H. Westphal, Hirschfänger,Zur historischen Entwicklung jagdlicher Seitenwaffen
- Frevert Walter,Das jagdliche Brauchtum
- Döbel,Jägerpractica, 1746
- V.Heppe,Aufrichtiger Lehrprinz oder Praktische Abhandlung von dem Leithund ,1751
- Niddaer Sauhatz von 1633

- Das grosse Kosmos Jagdlexikon 2004

M ELEY 9th May 2023 05:11 PM

In regars to sea-service 'hunting' hangers, it was the very fact that they were short (for close melee fighting on tight decks), often brass hilted (which made the grips rust resistant) and thick blades for hacking/chopping (fallen rigging, opponents wearing protective head gear).


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.