Ethnographic Arms & Armour

Ethnographic Arms & Armour (http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/index.php)
-   European Armoury (http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   A heavy French siege helmet Excavated in Bourgogne. (http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=22633)

Cerjak 1st May 2017 12:09 PM

A heavy French siege helmet Excavated in Bourgogne.
 
9 Attachment(s)
A heavy French siege helmet Excavated in Bourgogne.
Two pieces skull faceted in fourteen sections with a pivoted peak
This helmet is with additional plates mounted on the skull .
Siege helmet with such faceted skull are very rare.
Weight about 7 kg.
Any comment on it would be welcome.

cornelistromp 2nd May 2017 08:42 AM

weight of 7kg is not possible for a helmet , do you maybe mean 1.7kg ?

best,
Jasper

Cerjak 2nd May 2017 09:02 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by cornelistromp
weight of 7kg is not possible for a helmet , do you maybe mean 1.7kg ?

best,
Jasper

Siege Helmet
Jasper,
There is no mistake in the weight ,some siege helmet are about 10 kg ( see this example
http://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/26527
Date:ca. 1600–1650
Culture:French
Medium:Steel
Dimensions:H. 11 7/8 in. (30.16 cm); W. 9 7/8 in. (25.08 cm); D. 11 1/2 in. (29.2 cm); Wt. 20 lb. 9 oz (9.34 kg)
Classification:Helmets
Credit Line:Gift of William H. Riggs, 1913
Accession Number:14.25.495
a second siege helmet from my collection
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...t=siege+helmet
Best

Jean-Luc

Cerjak 2nd May 2017 05:52 PM

the bullet Proof
 
1 Attachment(s)
That dent is the bullet impact Proving that the helmet would absorb fire from hand gun, the dent it made in the skull, showing that the bullet didn't penetrate.

cornelistromp 2nd May 2017 06:50 PM

I see, very heavy to wear though.

best,
Jasper

fernando 2nd May 2017 07:00 PM

Owners necks would have to be stronger than those of Formula 1 pilots, due to G force ;) .

kronckew 3rd May 2017 09:14 AM

a lot of the weight would be distributed down to the rest of the armour and padding the helmet rested on and thus the shoulders took a lot of the burden. i think they and the rest of the armour were heavier as manning the walls didn't require the same mobility as on a battle field, and the extra thickness helped against missiles. if the enemy ever got over the walls and fighting became hand to hand, a lighter armour might be better. you could switch if you knew when they were going to make it over.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.