Odd handle for a Kampilan?
 

Hi wizards and experts,
-New to the forum I'd like to share some images on a sword that I've been told is a Kampilan but that has a handle I haven't seen in any of your forum images

Been in the family since 1930 and it was said to have been old already then when my Grandmother's brother picked it up in the Philipines

I would be interested in details on its origin and what you think about the handle...(why it is different from any other handles I've seen for Kampilans on the forum)

The blade is 70cm (27.5")

http://forumbilder.se/thumbs/ac10200951509ce78.jpg

http://forumbilder.se/thumbs/41102009515525391.jpg

http://forumbilder.se/thumbs/2a1020095170159d9.jpg


Thanks

Per

The handle style reminds me of Spunjer's avatar .

The blade ?
Very oddball for a Kampilan . :confused:

Thanks.
Any hints on where I can find pitures and more information about a "Spunjer's avatar" ?

/Per

Hej Per,

If you have a look in Leiden's picture database you will find resembling ones with hilts like yours collected on Timor (at www.rmv.nl)
This doesn't necessarily mean that yours has to be from Timor but that it probably is an older variation, that somehow survived longer
among the ex-pat Llanuns who were culturally isolated on Timor.
On the blade-tip it resembles a bit one of my older ones (enclosed), even if it goes the other way.
I suspect yours maybe has been reshaped based on what resembled traces after holes from brass-studs and a reshaped tip (maybe broken?)?
Congratulations to a very interesting and rare variation!

Michael

I thought the presence of a fuller somewhat unusual . :)

Copied your picture in case the photobucket link disappears in future. Nice handle ! :)

Page 71 of Zonneveld's books shows similar form. Timor it seems to be :shrug:

Gav

Cato in his book Moro Swords also talks about this as a rare form of kampilan.

Thanks Willem, i was just about to do that. Here's the other 2 images.

Wellcome to the forum
 

Hi Per!!

Wellcome to this forum, I think is the best!!
Congratulations with this kampilan, think in this hilt avoid me sleep!! :)
Best regards
Carlos

Beautiful kamp! And also an unusual sheat.

sajen

I wonder where the blade was forged; it is very different from the norm .

Everything about this sword is different from the norm.
The fiber on the hilt & sheath appears to be abaca, which is indigenous to the Philippines. A quick search shows the Dutch introduced it to Sumatra & the British introduced it to Borneo for rope making. I didn't see anything about Timor.
While I agree Timor is most likely the source, it seems odd the originator didn't use a local product.
Nice & unique sword.

Blade
 

I'm betting the blade was not forged in the Philippines .
This forging style reminds me of a Sasak-or-Sumatran klewang .

Can someone out there please show me another example of a fullered Kampilan blade with exposed pamor-like grain like this one has ?

WOW! Nice Kamp. I've been looking for one like that.
Thanks for sharing.

Perhaps this sword should be referred to as a Klewang from Timor. (Zonneveld's Traditional Weapons of Indonesian Archipelago, fig 272, pg. 71)
If this sword made it's way up to the Philippines, it may explain the abaca on hilt & sheath. Trade between the islands is endless & if it passed through the hands of one of the lumad tribes it seems plausible to use abaca rather then the traditional use of hair, the Moro's would use.

On page 59 a resembling one from the Philippines, as Battara mentioned earlier, is commented (maybe somebody else could post a picture as I don't have a camera available at the moment?).
In Foy's book three resembling "horse-head"-kampilans from the Museum of Dresden's collection is attributed to North-Celebes.
I don't really see why Per's and Cato's necessarily should be imported swords from Timor? Or maybe I misunderstood Bill?
The reason that there are several of them in Leiden is probably more based on that the Dutch were "better" in collecting colonial artefacts in Indonesia than the Spanish were in the Philippines. If the Philippines would have been a Dutch colony I am positive that more really old Moro weapons would have been saved.
I also think it's quite obvious that it's a kampilan and have considered van Z's classifying it as a "klewang" as one of the, surprisingly few, minor errors in his book. Unless you want to classify all kampilans as belonging to the klewang-category?

Michael

[I don't really see why Per's and Cato's necessarily should be imported swords from Timor? Or maybe I misunderstood Bill?
The reason that there are several of them in Leiden is probably more based on that the Dutch were "better" in collecting colonial artefacts in Indonesia than the Spanish were in the Philippines. If the Philippines would have been a Dutch colony I am positive that more really old Moro weapons would have been saved.

Hi,

I agree that it is not likely that sword where exported from Timor.

The other way has more chance I.M.O. note that Timor played an important role in the international trade of Sandalwood ( the only island who had it)
and iron smithing was not practised on Timor for a long time.

and indeed the Dutch where the best in getting the best artefacts.... and they still are :D :D :D

Arjan

There is an interesting dutch book on this topic ;)

Yes, but mostly I don't have time to read such books, did you :p ?

Hello ??
Anyone ??
We'll just ignore the strangeness of the blade then . :rolleyes:

I agree, it really should be considered a kampilan. My edition of Cato shows it pg. 53, fig 33. It does not appear to be typical of Mindanao kampilans but as we see, there is always exceptions. The blade construction still is problematic for Mindanao being the place of origin.

Here two fast taken pics from Cato's book, page 53 and from Zonneveld page 71.

The structure of the blade ( so not the shape) looks like the Celebes and Bugi swords.... but thats just a guess.....

Arjan

All we can do is guess; but I do not believe that blade originated in the Philippines .