The Fountain of Knowledge has spoken, and yes a good choclate cake hmm could do with a slice now.

Regards, Martin

indeed, as I suspected, there was a reason set in the forging methods.

Again then the question arises on the weapon being made to be actually used as a weapon ( the fuller make the weapon lighter and the consequent risers make it more robust to hitting other blades) . If the only purpose was to create a decoration item and there is a lot of decoration content (let alone a symbolic one) in a keris with a pamor along such a long blade, why would they have gone through the forging process which is highly suited to create a weapon apt to be used in combat against another blade?

:D:D

Milandro, the reason is not really in the forging of the blade, it is in the carving of the blade.

Just about all the features you see in a blade are carved in.

Everybody unfamiliar with the process always thinks in terms of forging, but it is the cold work that gives the keris its features and that uses time.


I have made a few keris using traditional Javanese methods, that means no electric tools, only the traditional tools that were in use until very recently when makers began to use angle grinders, and die grinders so forth.

Working by myself with no striker, I was able to make the forging for a keris blade using pamor wos wutah in about 4 days --- using a striker cuts that time in half --- but to carve the blade, a simple straight blade, tilam upih or similar would take me around 10 to 12 days, something like a sinom robyong would take 14 to 16 days.

Hi Alan,

Now would this blade be pamor or a blade that went wrong?

From Peninsular Malaysia perhaps?

Length: 56 cm from Tip to base of Ganja.

Cheers.