View Full Version : A simple gunong with pattern welded blade
Ferguson
17th November 2007, 08:30 PM
Another simple gunong, with an engraved pattern welded 5 3/8" (13.65cm)blade . Overall length is 8 3/4"(22.2cm). Banati hilt with silver(?) and copper ferrule. Not old, but nice. For your enjoyment.
Steve
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v163/sferguson53/Public/Gunong/gunong-3-front.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v163/sferguson53/Public/Gunong/gunong-3-back.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v163/sferguson53/Public/Gunong/gunong-3-blade-1.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v163/sferguson53/Public/Gunong/gunong-3-blade-2.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v163/sferguson53/Public/Gunong/gunong-3-tip.jpg
Rick
17th November 2007, 08:47 PM
I like these little fellows . :D
Bill M
17th November 2007, 08:54 PM
Me too
kronckew
17th November 2007, 11:19 PM
nice one steve, bit like my one in my avatar over in the other place
http://i153.photobucket.com/albums/s231/kronckew/gunung2.jpg
bit easier to see if you use the original tho ;)
http://i153.photobucket.com/albums/s231/kronckew/gun2.jpg
haven't dared etch it yet
Ferguson
18th November 2007, 12:42 AM
Guys, this is great! Love to see more of these. :) Keep it up.
Kronck, you've got to give that one an etch. She really looks like she may be hiding a wonderful secret.
Steve
Rick
18th November 2007, 01:00 AM
Here's another cutie . :D
http://www.arscives.com/historysteel/images1/183-pm13.jpg
DaveS
18th November 2007, 02:46 AM
Steve: I think this one just might be older than you think. I wouldn't be surprised if it was early 1900s to maybe 1930. It just dosn't look like a 60s or 70s piece to me. The blade and handle look much too refined to my eye to be that late. A very nice moro dagger..............Dave.
Ferguson
18th November 2007, 09:17 AM
Steve: I think this one just might be older than you think. I wouldn't be surprised if it was early 1900s to maybe 1930. It just dosn't look like a 60s or 70s piece to me. The blade and handle look much too refined to my eye to be that late. A very nice moro dagger..............Dave.
That's excellent! Thanks Dave.
Steve
Battara
18th November 2007, 08:44 PM
I don't know....I would not necessarily place it in the 60s but it is not 1900-1930s. I might place it in the 40s-50s. This might account for the lamination and the later blade engraving. The style of hilt would also make sense from this time period. Earlier ones (1900s-1920s) tend not to have engravings and are longer and definitely laminated.
Ferguson
18th November 2007, 11:31 PM
Heck, I'm happy either way. Thanks Jose. :)
Steve
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.