View Full Version : Beautiful Pendray knife as well as the price!!
Mare Rosu
29th April 2007, 07:07 PM
Mr. Pendray did excellent work on this blade.
Closed item on eBay.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=020&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT&viewitem=&item=300102800253&rd=1&rd=1
Emanuel
29th April 2007, 07:15 PM
A magnificent blade, and I like the lines of the whole thing. The guard flows well with the blade and I like the combination of rib and T-spine. I dislike the fittings though...I think the piece would have been more attractive with a nice wood or ivory scales.
Regards,
Emanuel
Battara
29th April 2007, 09:20 PM
would you post some pictures, the link is good butr the pictures are gone.
Mare Rosu
29th April 2007, 09:57 PM
Pendray knife pictures
Mare Rosu
29th April 2007, 10:08 PM
Please do not drool on your computer! ;)
ariel
30th April 2007, 03:59 AM
Personally, I think is is garish.
Lew
30th April 2007, 05:14 AM
The blade is nice but the furniture is complete fantasy as my mother use to say it's Ongepatcheket (Overdecorated, overdone) :)
Lew
ALEX
30th April 2007, 08:57 AM
Also do not like these fittings. I've seen the similar, but old, filigree fittings on some old Middle Eastern, Albanian/Balkan daggers, but they never impressed me. Agree with Manolo - Woots looks much better in the "natural" fittings, i.e. bone and leather. Also, for THAT price one can get a fine antique wootz sword (or actually several nice and old swords and daggers). Excuse the comment about the price though, it is just my opinion !!!
ariel
30th April 2007, 04:56 PM
Glad I am not alone!
The silverwok on this piece is the simplest and the cheapest Caucasian decoration technique. You can see similar examples on e-bay for $19.99 ( stamped blade included :p ) and the only difference is that the present one is silver. I was told that Georgian mass-producers of these souvenirs employ part-time youngsters ( kind of " flipping hamburgers"-type job) and those start producing commercial wares after 2-3 days of practice. This is fine for a $19.99 trinket, but I would never pay $8,500 for this " Fantasy Sword of Klingon General" !
Tim Simmons
30th April 2007, 05:33 PM
You are not alone. I thought this was bad enough with pearls and enamel. I have to sing my own praises :D :D :D . Rather expensive garnets :p .
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v426/jamhappy/D001.jpg
Lew
30th April 2007, 05:44 PM
That's my big gripe with the custom knife business today they make some nice stuff but they charge prices that are astronomical. I once showed a famous knife smith one of my wootz katars that I paid only $150-200 he said it was nice and if I wanted one made by him it would cost $2,000 :eek: So why buy a copy when you can have the real deal for much less :confused: :shrug: People just get caught up in the hype that's my opinion.
Lew
ariel
30th April 2007, 06:52 PM
Agree with Lew 100%.
Modern swordmaking is an industry that manufactures toys and home decorations. Modern-made blades will never be used anyway ( are you going to slice sausages with a $8,500 blade?). For all I know, these high-priced Damascus blades may be no better than Taiwanese dinner knives from K-Mart: nobody will ever put them to practical test. And even if they are 10 times better than Ginsu knives, so what? Whose life had depended on the quality of his sword over the past 150 years?
Why would I want to have a blade with no history behind it? Without some romantic story, be it about the owner, the era, the war, the tradition?
Some want to revive lost technological process? More power to them. Some want to master old decorating techniques? Great! But to pretend that the final result has anything in common with the old weapons is like selling a "hand-painted" copy of Van Gogh's oil as a real thing and having a gall to ask twice the price of the original (" I had to work very hard to fake Van Gogh's style!")
Lew
30th April 2007, 07:37 PM
Ariel
Pendray makes a great knife that's tuff nails and he doesn't charge that much for his work I actually paid very little for an all wootz knife with a 5" blade a few years back. The price sky rockets once the knife falls into one of these purveyor's hands. I have actually over heard them at shows telling other sellers that their prices are to low and to charge more so the big guys don't get under cut so buyer beware :eek: I once traded a damascus camp knife a few months later it showed up on one of these websites where it went for fives times what I paid :mad: go figure :confused:
Lew
Mare Rosu
30th April 2007, 11:30 PM
I also agree on the "garish" as stated by Ariel as well as what Louieblades said. As the blade did not sell also indicates the "Price is not Right".
My comments are on the BLADE not the furniture. I think that Pendray's modern wootz is some of the best around. I am of the opinion that Pendray made just the blade and someone else made the rest.
I did learn something (any day is a good day when I learn anything, and most of my days are very good) ;) when Ariel stated that it is the cheapest style work. I am always amazed of the collective knowledge of folks on this forum.
ariel
1st May 2007, 03:19 AM
Ariel
Pendray makes a great knife that's tuff nails and he doesn't charge that much for his work I actually paid very little for an all wootz knife with a 5" blade a few years back. The price sky rockets once the knife falls into one of these purveyor's hands. I have actually over heard them at shows telling other sellers that their prices are to low and to charge more so the big guys don't get under cut so buyer beware :eek: I once traded a damascus camp knife a few months later it showed up on one of these websites where it went for fives times what I paid :mad: go figure :confused:
Lew
I am sure that Mr. Pendray's blades are technically superb and can cut regular steel like butter. But... who is going to try it for the price? I fully understand that there are 2 kinds of collectors ( many more in reality!): those who admire technical aspects of the blades and those who seek history and romance behind the sword. I am firmly in the latter camp and that's why I am not thrilled by modern blades no matter how beautiful and technically superb they might be. Give me an oldie, coming from a violent place with a fascinating history any time, something that likely saw a battle and bears scars to prove it and I am happy.
But, to each his preferences...
More from Zaza Revishvili:
http://www.balisongcollector.com/galleryZ.html
http://www.knifeshows.com/revishvili/revishvili.html
The best part, of course, he was a professional football player and is on the list of Best Ever Georgian Football Players
http://www.gff.ge/index.php?lang_id=ENG&sec_id=112
This is for our European Forumites: no real American will be impressed by this info anyway. And, just for them: football means soccer :rolleyes: .
Emanuel
1st May 2007, 03:54 AM
Looks like he's really into garnets and excessive silver filigree :shrug: too bad for the blades.
katana
2nd May 2007, 03:06 PM
It appears that the majority are in agreement....and I have to say IMHO they are right. Fantastic blade...beautiful curves :cool: but the furniture :shrug: OTT and too 'fancy'.......not my cup of tea ...at all....especially at that price :eek:
You cannot beat the historical .....and dare I say... the romancism of old arms :cool: Newly made edged weapons, are to my mind 'soul less'.........
Gt Obach
2nd May 2007, 03:36 PM
honestly
when you think about it..... how much did those old blades cost to produce back in ancient times ?.. some the price of a kingdom...
and now you can get them for a song and a dance :rolleyes:
not that i'm defending pendray... but he was the pres of the american blade smith assoc. at one time....
G
tsubame1
2nd May 2007, 03:49 PM
I wonder what Antonio thinks about this matter...
Andrew
2nd May 2007, 03:59 PM
Personally, I love the fact modern smiths are continuing the art and traditions of the past. The Pendray blade that started this thread is an excellent example, and one I'd be proud to own.
I, myself, have several modern interpretations of my favorite weapons, and every single one is a work of art. None were inexpensive, and all cost more than I've paid for nearly any antique. I was happy to pay the price for the quality of workmanship in every instance.
Any attempt to compare the "worth" or "value" of antiques to their modern counterparts will fail. You may as well attempt to compare modern hand-crafted furniture to antique furniture. :shrug:
tsubame1
2nd May 2007, 04:05 PM
Not to talk about modern-made swords/furnitures that are made in the same traditional way as the ancient ones making no break in the tradition.
A large part of japanese antiques are cheap junk in front of works by very
talented japanese modern makers.
Sometimes even western makers surpass lower lever antique ones.
I wonder how much this apply to other cultures as well...
Andrew
2nd May 2007, 04:17 PM
Not to talk about modern-made swords/furnitures that are made in the same traditional way as the ancient ones making no break in the tradition.
A large part of japanese antiques are cheap junk in front of works by very
talented japanese modern makers.
Sometimes even werstern makers surpass lower lever antique ones.
I wonder how much this apply to other cultures as well...
I agree completely: some of my antiques are junk.
tsubame1
2nd May 2007, 04:22 PM
I agree completely: some of my antiques are junk.
My first blade wasn't worthy even of the costs of the restoration...
Lew
2nd May 2007, 04:34 PM
[QUOTE=Gt Obach]honestly
when you think about it..... how much did those old blades cost to produce back in ancient times ?.. some the price of a kingdom...
and now you can get them for a song and a dance :rolleyes:
Gt
I really don't think they would have cost a kingdom for a dagger maybe a horse or something like that. At the last Timonium seminar there was discussion about how much it would cost to supply a warrior in the Polish army during the 16th or 17th century the cost of a good sword was not that expensive. I have heard that during viking times a good sword was worth the equivalent of $25,000 but that was before good steel was available in larger quantities. It is amazing that when you see some modern makers asking $1200 for a small hunting knife and these guys claim they have some super heat treatment which they claim can make 5,000 cuts in a piece of rope before becoming dull. It's all hype and there are a lot of gullible people out there willing to empty their pockets to buy one. I have been there and done that and that is why I now only collect Antique weapons. Pendray is a great guy and he does not think that one needs to charge an arm and a leg for a knife you can buy a wootz dagger from him for about what you would pay for an antique one. Btw the funniest thing I ever saw was was when at an ABS cutting competition I saw big burly men trying to cut through the wooden dowl of a toilet plunger to prove how good there expensive bowie knives were :eek: :D you never know when a plunger will jump out from behind a tree and attack you in the woods so you better have one of these knives at your side :eek: :eek: :p
Lew
Gt Obach
2nd May 2007, 04:59 PM
i agree but a horse was still very valuable.. and the daggers must have been aswell
there will alway be hype with blades... just seems to go with the territory..
but the abs does have standards and you should get a decent knife from one of their js or ms smiths....
decent knife for normal situations... excluding fierce plunger attacks, ofcourse
G
ALEX
2nd May 2007, 05:12 PM
Agree with Lew.
The first expensive modern knife I bought based on "Virtually Undestructible" claims and DVD commercial was a Cold Steel tanto knife. I took it to the jungle and tried to open a coconut. The blade tip snapped without even applying a pressure. Yet you see guys piercing a car hood with it in the commercial. So now I have a $40 good old knife, and it never fails. However, the point is only in QUALITY. It is not fair to compare a bad antique with good modern (and vice versa). Similarly, it is not fair to disrespect the antique artist by comparing the product made with and without ANY modern technology.
Lew
2nd May 2007, 05:43 PM
Agree with Lew.
It is not fair to compare a bad antique with good modern (and vice versa). Similarly, it is not fair to disrespect the antique artist by comparing the product made with and without ANY modern technology.
Alex
Years ago a famous bladesmith referred to the stuff we collect as tribal junk which I thought was quite snobbish.
Lew
Tim Simmons
2nd May 2007, 06:01 PM
Snobbish :eek: :D :D :D more like blind ignorance, I wish there were more like him these days :o :shrug:
tsubame1
2nd May 2007, 06:47 PM
Alex
Years ago a famous bladesmith referred to the stuff we collect as tribal junk which I thought was quite snobbish.
Lew
It can even be understood as a racist quote... "tribal junk"... :(
Anyway, on other fora I'm renown to be "traditionally minded" :D but
honestly age is *not* a warranty of quality. Of course you can't expect
from a modern made sword the same feeling an antique (even a junk one)
has, but it's not fair, IMHO to completely put down modern made works.
The one that started this thread seems to me an excellent work, but to
make judgment about the price or the historical/cultural accuracy is
beyond my knowledge.
Gt Obach
2nd May 2007, 10:05 PM
cold steel sells production knives... .. same idea as the walmart type knives... which some people seem to prefer... ( maybe for the economy, or stainless nature... and that all the good i could possibly say about that )
- they are completely different from a custom knife..
i still maintain that the ancient blades that are bought now ...are usually at unbeatable prices...not at all compared to the old days.. if you were to pay the equivalent now a days... ha ha ;)
... so with that in mind, you are usually getting an acceptable price for some of the decent custom knives being made today...
G
ps... as you can see with the dha that Jesus made.... !
Andrew
2nd May 2007, 10:38 PM
ps... as you can see with the dha that Jesus made.... !
Got pics? :D
Gt Obach
2nd May 2007, 11:05 PM
oh dear... I meant Jesus Hernandez
http://forums.dfoggknives.com/index.php?showtopic=7567
Greg :o
ariel
2nd May 2007, 11:14 PM
oh dear... I meant Jesus Hernandez
http://forums.dfoggknives.com/index.php?showtopic=7567
Greg :o
Ah, I thought the other one :)
He was into carpentry: scabbards, shira saya etc
Andrew
2nd May 2007, 11:23 PM
oh dear... I meant Jesus Hernandez
http://forums.dfoggknives.com/index.php?showtopic=7567
Greg :o
I know. ;)
A. G. Maisey
3rd May 2007, 12:27 AM
Commencing in about 1978 I was involved in the making of custom knives.
I made a few complete knives, but was not fast enough, nor good enough to make more than about $2.50 per hour for my work.
I was pretty competent at making blades though, and I made a lot of damascus and nickel damascus blades for other makers.
I made billets, blanks, and completed blades.
These blades were all forged by hand with a hand held hammer, and the blades that I took to finished stage were made using hand tools, not machine grinders, linishers, and the like.Effectively I was working the way traditional smiths worked prior to the industrial revolution.
I did this work as a hobby, and I enjoyed it. I also became pretty fast at turning out blades. So fast that I was able to base my prices on $10 per hour.
The custom makers that I sold my blades to mostly worked to extremely high standards and tolerances.They invested very large sums of money in equipment that enabled them to turn out knives that were technological works of art. Fit and finish taken to the highest degree and the closest tolerances.
Many of these makers were machinists, tool makers, die makers, or other metal workers.One or two were jewellers who concentrated on lavish adornment. They were for the most part, skilled tradesmen working with their trade skills at a hobby.
Whenever the subject of remuneration for the work we did in making knives came up, it invariably came around to how little we could make on an hourly basis, compared with what we could make at our regular jobs. When the cost of equipment was factored in, it was obvious that many, if not most of these custom knife makers were not making any money at all from their work, but were in fact paying for the pleasure of pursuing a hobby.
My situation was a bit different:- I was working with low tech equipment, mostly stuff I'd made myself. The most expensive thing I had was the anvil, and that had cost me $120. My forge was built in an old truck wheel, and my blower was an old vacuum cleaner. What I made from making blades was pretty much all clear money.
I was able to turn out a useable knife from motor vehicle coil spring in about 40 minutes---straighten the coil, forge to shape, hoop handle, clean up, heat treat.
However, I also made a number of keris blades.
The shortest time a keris blade ever took me to make was 16 full working days.
The longest time a keris blade ever took me to make was 47 mandays, including 6 mandays working with two strikers in the forging.
Making a knife, or a dagger, or a sword is no different to any other work. It is simply work, that dependent upon the technology used, and the standard of the work, takes part of a person's life to complete.
When you buy a custom, or hand-made, knife you are paying for that part of a human life used in the production of the knife you have bought.
At what price do you sell your life to your clients, customers or employers?
ariel
3rd May 2007, 04:18 AM
I also agree on the "garish" as stated by Ariel as well as what Louieblades said. As the blade did not sell also indicates the "Price is not Right".
My comments are on the BLADE not the furniture. I think that Pendray's modern wootz is some of the best around. I am of the opinion that Pendray made just the blade and someone else made the rest.
I did learn something (any day is a good day when I learn anything, and most of my days are very good) ;) when Ariel stated that it is the cheapest style work. I am always amazed of the collective knowledge of folks on this forum.
Here is an example of a contemporary, mass-produced Georgian "kindjal" with a filigree job similar to the $8,500 one :rolleyes:
http://cgi.ebay.com/GEORGIAN-CAUCASIAN-COSSACK-DAGGER-KINDJAL_W0QQitemZ330113234665QQihZ014QQcategoryZ88 903QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
Lew
3rd May 2007, 06:28 AM
A.G.
I understand that some knives are more work intensive but the smith who wanted to charge me $1200 for a using knife told me it took him a week to make a simple hunter and he broke it down by the hour in which he charged me for the time it took for the blade to cool after each forging 3 days where the blade just sat in his shop cooling slowly. A good knife smith should be able to make a standard knife in 3-4 days tops. Fancy art knives could take months of work and I can undestand having to pay a high price for one. Al Pendray would charge about $650-$800 for the blade so $8,000 just for the hilt and a scabbard is quite a bit much in IMO. There are good smiths here in the states that make good knives at affordable prices those are the only ones I deal with now when I want a good using blade. We have had this discussion at some seminars on custom knife making and feel that $35 an hour is fair for making knives most of these guys use trip hammers so it is quicker for them to bang out a blade. I think we just about exhausted this subject and there are always pro and cons when dealing with modern custom knives I think this thread should be put to rest at this point before it gets out of hand.
Regards
Lew
A. G. Maisey
3rd May 2007, 09:17 AM
Yes Lew, I tend to agree with you.
After all, this is a forum for discussion of ethnographic weaponry, not custom knives.
But just as a matter of interest, what do you think the capital investment might be in a trip hammer?
ariel
3rd May 2007, 12:44 PM
My comments are not meant to insult or belittle modern bladesmiths or other artisans involved in making replicas, modern renditions, old style etc, etc knives and swords.
I am just trying to clarify my purely personal reasons for not collecting them.
For me, history behind the object is of paramount importance. Any modern creation, no matter how technically advanced or artistic, lacks the ingredient of authenticity. These are not for me.
Others admire technical superiority of modern blades and the variety of exotic materials unavailable to old masters. They are the market that decides how much to pay for a contemporary sword.
The pricing for both ends of the spectrum is purely artificial and equally arbitrary. Any knifemaker, like any artisan, can charge whatever price he wishes. The market will decide. After all, what is the rational explanation for $3,000 - $15,000 price tags on Fiegel's Tulwars? $ 100,000 for a Katana? they have no practical contemporary value. Why is Kilij costing on the average twice as much as Shamshir? Who said that a good Khanjarli should command 5 times as much as Bichwa? The price is dictated not by the number of hours or cost of equipment, but by the collectors' "fashion of the day". Moro today, Chechnya tomorrow, Zaza Revishvili in 100 years.
Lew
3rd May 2007, 03:11 PM
Yes Lew, I tend to agree with you.
After all, this is a forum for discussion of ethnographic weaponry, not custom knives.
But just as a matter of interest, what do you think the capital investment might be in a trip hammer?
A.G.
A new 100lb trip hammer will cost about $5000 but if you do some looking you can buy an older used one for about half.
Lew
A. G. Maisey
3rd May 2007, 09:23 PM
Thanks Lew.
And that is only part of the capital investment required to produce a finely crafted custom knife to the standards demanded by today's extremely discerning buyers.
The makers I have known over the years have never achieved anything like the $35 PH that you consider to be reasonable remuneration for this type of work, and they have mostly regarded their investment in the equipment required to produce fine knives to be in the nature of "hobby costs".
However, if somebody wants to make a living from his work, he must factor in his capital costs, depreciation on his plant and equipment, his insurance costs, he must make provision for superannuation, and if he wants a holiday every year, or to cover days when he cannot work because of illness, he must factor allowances for that in too.Then there is the cost of material, and any other unmentioned overheads.
Ultimately the marketplace decides the price of a product. Makers like the fellow who you consider charged you too much for his product may not be able to compete. However, if that maker was doing something for which there was a demand, and which was unique, then possibly he could continue to charge prices which to you appeared to be unreasonable.
My personal position is that modern custom knife work, for the most part leaves me cold. Don't like it at all. I much prefer older pieces, or pieces with an ethnic flavour. For instance, I have a very soft spot for puukos.
But the only way we can truly determine in an objective way if any item is over priced is by analysis of the production of the item concerned.
Of course, the marketplace is not much into objective production analysis, but it is very sensitive to price, so what we usually finish up with is the bare minimum standard that satisfies the requirement.
Tim Simmons
3rd May 2007, 09:55 PM
Talking about the market is a tricky thing. Demand can be governed by a taste or perception rather than enquiry and investigation, largely depending on how intellegent the money is :D :D :D :eek: :rolleyes:
Gt Obach
4th May 2007, 12:06 AM
i remain somewhere in the middle ...liking both old and new blades.... ... after making a few myself.. i've a healthy respect for the smiths who do this for a living... i do think that there are some people doing very nicely in the biz of knives... but probably not a good as some of the antique dealers.. (maybe)
i've seen some 50lbs lil giant hammer go for 2000.... but the 30 ton hydraulic press seems to be more fashionable now a days..
all that being said... i do find pendray's blades abit pricey, but apparently he's got the name to sell it
i do like this kard he made... ( except the mokume pommel :mad: )
http://customknifegallery.com/pendray1f.html
G
A. G. Maisey
4th May 2007, 09:44 PM
Yeah, spot on, Tim.
It pretty much depends on what drives a person to purchase the knife.
Like a car:- do you buy the Ferrari to cruise the beaches, or the Corolla to get you from point A to point B cheaply and reliably?
Or maybe you've got one of each in the garage.
Personally, I see modern custom knives as collectables, just as are jambiyas, keris, pesh kabz and so on.
I prefer the ethnic stuff; others prefer the work of modern custom makers.
Where it can get a bit unstable is where you buy a custom maker's knife to do the job of a tool; if that maker has produced what he sees as a collectable, it gets a bit hard to justify big dollars for what the buyer sees as a tool.
And yes, that is a seriously nice kard.
tsubame1
5th May 2007, 01:09 AM
( except the mokume pommel :mad: )
You know... Mokume is trendy. Even engagement and marriage rings made
that way. My wife would have trow such rings out of the window... :p
But they are quiet well suited for Habaki IMHO.
@ Ariel. The link provided shows an evidently chep work, but the quality of
the mounting that started this thread is evidently much better too.
I can't say if enough to justify thousand of dollars, but if the stones are ruby
(obviously not the pidgeon-blood burmese ones...) the price increase.
To put an 8K U$ mounting on a 800 U$ blade is what, in my way to appreciate
weapons, the real nonsense...
Antonio Cejunior
5th May 2007, 04:33 AM
I wonder what Antonio thinks about this matter...
I'm flattered to suddenly see my name here, Marco.
I'm no authority on Russian art and won't claim authority on anything :)
IMO, however, I do have my personal taste reservations on overly decorated art pieces such as Fabergé Eggs
http://www.radishworks.com/ModelLib2/images/M60FabergeEgg.jpg
and cloisonée work
http://www.bennettauctions.com/2003/052903_portsmouth/052903_photos/Cloisonne.jpg
as I think that they belong to a very specific expression that is not to my personal taste.
Presently there is an exhibition at the Museum, called Edictus Ridiculum (http://www.artmuseum.gov.mo/show.asp?prg_id=2007050501&language=3)by a friend, Russian artist Konstantin Bessmertny which is a fantastic example of irony and criticism on the world of Gambling, the Kitsch of getting Pharaohs, Zeus sculptures on a city dominated by Casinos which inevitably do refer to the theatrical and the ridiculous. I wish you guys could see this fantastic exhibition for what it represents. He is a 20th ~21st century Bosch or Breughel.
The entire exhibition is an installation which poses us the question of what is taste and what is the excess of it.
So I will not comment on the piece specifically as it is someone else's work. :)
tsubame1
5th May 2007, 04:58 PM
Hi Antonio. Honestly I was referring to the belittling of
modern made artworks that was too strong in the replies (IMHO),
and not suggesting you're for the overdecorated ones.
I know your taste is quiet far from "Barocco Siciliano",
as is mine... ;)
Rick
5th May 2007, 10:16 PM
Hi Carlo,
Those stones are Garnets; were they quality rubies it would be worth the price for the stones alone . ;) :D
I chipped this raw Garnet out of a quartz boulder here in New England. :)
Antonio Cejunior
5th May 2007, 11:43 PM
Hi Antonio. Honestly I was referring to the belittling of
modern made artworks that was too strong in the replies (IMHO),
and not suggesting you're for the overdecorated ones.
I know your taste is quiet far from "Barocco Siciliano",
as is mine... ;)
Hi Marco,
I'm sorry if I did not get it.
I think some replies extrapolate from your original post. :shrug:
It is a risk.
Lee
7th May 2007, 03:56 PM
How fortunate that our tastes and interests are diverse; otherwise most of us would not be able to afford a single thing that we really wanted. This thread has really opened into a number of philosophical discussions and it is the sort of off topic thread that I enjoy.
My own collecting philosophy and taste very much parallels that espoused by Ariel, although I do have a few modern pieces of diverse origins and also a few recently reworked pieces incorporating antique components.
I remember an old forum thread (on another site) in which one participant asked of the membership which Oakeshott type of European medieval sword they would most like to own an original antique example of. One reply nearly blew me off of my seat, for its author opined he would not want an antique out of revulsion as to what evils might have been committed with it and that he strongly preferred to be the owner of a new sword of known (clean) provenance.
Provided a modern bladesmith understands balance, edge geometry and material selection including proper heat treatment for that material and has the skill to apply same, that bladesmith can likely make a blade of significantly better functional quality than most of the antique blades many of us so cherish. That is the advantage modern science has given us and many modern smiths are truly great masters of their craft. Still I must reserve a special awe for the old masters who, without a framework of science and without modern tools, managed to create some fine works out of tradition and trial and error with the most primitive of tools.
ariel
8th May 2007, 02:27 AM
How fortunate that our tastes and interests are diverse; otherwise most of us would not be able to afford a single thing that we really wanted. This thread has really opened into a number of philosophical discussions and it is the sort of off topic thread that I enjoy.
My own collecting philosophy and taste very much parallels that espoused by Ariel, although I do have a few modern pieces of diverse origins and also a few recently reworked pieces incorporating antique components.
I remember an old forum thread (on another site) in which one participant asked of the membership which Oakeshott type of European medieval sword they would most like to own an original antique example of. One reply nearly blew me off of my seat, for its author opined he would not want an antique out of revulsion as to what evils might have been committed with it and that he strongly preferred to be the owner of a new sword of known (clean) provenance.
Provided a modern bladesmith understands balance, edge geometry and material selection including proper heat treatment for that material and has the skill to apply same, that bladesmith can likely make a blade of significantly better functional quality than most of the antique blades many of us so cherish. That is the advantage modern science has given us and many modern smiths are truly great masters of their craft. Still I must reserve a special awe for the old masters who, without a framework of science and without modern tools, managed to create some fine works out of tradition and trial and error with the most primitive of tools.
When some visitors (usually of female persuasion) ask me in a swooning tone of voice, whether some, but just some, of those horrible things might have, you know, actually ... killed a person, I try to keep a straight face and honestly answer "I hope so" :rolleyes:
Montino Bourbon
8th May 2007, 08:55 AM
I love it, especially the Wusthof Santoku; a real pleasure to use, although I also like the Wusthof 8 inch chef's knife.
For a dagger, however, I'll take wootz with an Ivory grip, or a nice keris with pamor 'raja abala raja'.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.