vikingsword.com forums
  Ethnographic Edged Weapons
  Taiwanese (Formosan) Aboriginal Weapons

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Taiwanese (Formosan) Aboriginal Weapons
Ian
Senior Member
posted 01-26-2002 16:11     Click Here to See the Profile for Ian   Click Here to Email Ian     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
A few months back we had been searching for the origin of some choppers that came in scabbards with open faces closed with metal "staples." It was suggested that these were Taiwanese in origin.

The previous discussion can be found here:

http://www.vikingsword.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/000582.html

(Tom Hyle was the only one of us who had the correct attribution.)

I've recently come across an excellent book on the native Formosans. It is called Material Culture of the Formosan Aborigines by Dr. Chen Chi-Lu and published by the Taiwan Museum, Taipei in 1968. There are several pages on weapons (pp. 146-161), with line drawings of spears, harpoons, bows, arrows, cross-bows, knives, shields, and body armor. I am posting a scan of Figure 52 (p. 154) depicting knives of the different tribal groups.





A1, A2 are Paiwanese knives, and a discussion of these can be found elsewhere on the EEWRS site under Geographic Index: Asia -- Knives of the Taiwan Aborigines by the late Dr. Sherrod Anderson and Philip Tom.

B is attributed to the Atayal tribe, and is the type that we had discussed earlier.

C is similar to the Atayal knife and is used by the Tsou.

D1, D2 are small ceremonial knives worn around the neck by members of the Yami tribe.

After checking with Lee about the fair use of copyright materials, I am posting a transcription of the text on knives from the book by Dr. Chen Chi-Lu. You might consider this a review of his work for the ethnographic edged weapon collector. Here is what he has to say about knives and swords.

------------------Quote-----------------

"The knife is one of the most important implements for daily life, and universal among human groups. Large knives may also be used in fighting, however, among the Formosan aborigines, no knives are specially designed for such purpose. Knives commonly seen among different groups on the main island measure about 50 cm [20 inches] long, and 4 cm [1.6 inches] wide. Most of them curve slightly upward at the tip of the blade. The degree of the upward turn is more prominent in those of the northern groups (Figure 52: B) and the central groups (Figure 52: C). The handles are mostly made of wood and usually measure between 15-20 cm [6-8 inches]. Some of the handles have a copper wire or rattan splint wrapped around them for strength and to prevent the hand from slipping (Figure 52: B-C). There is no guard on Formosan aboriginal knives. The sheaths are also made of wood and mostly one-sided. The reverse side is usually fastened with copper wire or iron plates in even intervals. Therefore the blade can be clearly seen when it is the sheath. The end of the sheath is sometimes decorated with human hair. The knife blade of the southern groups is usually straighter. Its end is obliquely sharpened with the pointed tip at the back side. Consequently the sheaths are also straight in form. Most of the handles and sheaths have carved designs on their surfaces. The design motifs include human figures, human heads, and snakes. These motifs may also be arranged in a series to fit the long and narrow surface of the sheath. The handles and the sheaths are usually painted red.

The Yami of Botel Tobago have two kinds of swords. The long sword is characterized by its slightly upwards turned tip. The blade measures about 30 cm [12 inches] long and 2.5 cm [1 inch] wide. There is no guard on the Yami sword. The handle and the sheath are similar to that of other groups, but normally simple and plain (Figure 54: C). Another kind of sword used by the Yami is the hanging dagger which is called takkurus. The takkurus is a very meagre blade that measures about 15 cm [6 inches] long and 2.5 cm [1 inch] wide. But it is ill matched with a large sheath made of hard wood. The sheath is an axe-blade shape (wide in both ends and narrow in the central portion) with a pointed end. Both surfaces of the sheath are engraved with designs. Besides geometric designs, quite often the figures of magamaog, a legendary culture hero of the tribe, are seen (Figure 52: D). This dagger is not for practical use. It is always carried by men outdoors as an ornament and as a means of exorcising evil spirits."

----------------End Quote----------------

Reference. Chen Chi-Lu. Material Culture of the Formosan Aborigines. The Taiwan Museum:Taipei, 1968, pp. 155-156.

I recommend this book with enthusiasm. It has accounts of textiles, clothing, pottery, housing, and details of the daily life of native groups. Very well done. I hope this puts to rest the origin of those mystery knives.

Ian.


[This message has been edited by Lee Jones (edited 01-27-2002).]

[This message has been edited by Ian (edited 01-27-2002).]

IP: Logged

tom hyle
Senior Member
posted 01-26-2002 18:56     Click Here to See the Profile for tom hyle   Click Here to Email tom hyle     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I have recently seen on the computer a sword twice or else two similar swords in such open-fronted sheaths, the openings covered with flat metal bands/staples. Both(? I'm rolling with that) were said to be Tibetan (etc.) and certainly seemed to fit that attribution. Perhaps this type of sheath is widespread? It doesn't seem to go well with the snow (of tibet), but then it doesn't seem to go well with the rain, either. Of course, I always like to hear I was right about a thing; I have enough vanity for that, I guess.

IP: Logged

M ELEY
Senior Member
posted 01-26-2002 22:42     Click Here to See the Profile for M ELEY     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I DON'T MEAN TO BUTT IN,GUYS,BUT BRINGING UP THE SUBJECT OF CHOPPERS HAS GOT ME TO THINKING ABOUT A QUESTION I POSTED CONCERNING A PAIR ON EBAY AUCTION RECENTLY(EBAY#1502510359). FROM SHEAR GUESS WORK,I THOUGHT THEY MIGHT BE THAI/SIAMESE. I DIDN'T END UP BUYING THEM,AS THE SELLER TOLD ME THAT THEIR EDGES HAD BEEN GROUND AWAY. WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THEIR ORIGIN? CERTAINLY NOT FIGIAN/HAWAIIAN,AS THE SELLER THOUGHT...

IP: Logged

Ian
Senior Member
posted 01-27-2002 23:15     Click Here to See the Profile for Ian   Click Here to Email Ian     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I'm bringing this one back up because I have added some interesting text from the same reference as the illustration.

Ian.

IP: Logged

Conogre
Senior Member
posted 01-28-2002 00:00     Click Here to See the Profile for Conogre   Click Here to Email Conogre     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
First off, thanks Ian for the posting and the definitive ID, as I've seen them sold as African or Philippino, but never Taiwanese.
In an e-mail, it was mentioned that the author of the book speculated on a connection between the peoples of Taiwan and those of Assam (who also use an open sided scabbard for some of the dhas/daos, which is probably directly related to the similar scabbards of Tibet), while a distinct similarity in both the hilt treatment AND scabbard style also seems apparent in the hinalungs and pinahigs with their hikots in the N Philippines among the Igorot.
Coincedently, the Kuki daos (thanks for that one also Ian) apparently nieghbors of the Nagas in or near Assam ALSO sport both blades with a spike on the spine and hair adornment, as frequently found on both the Dayak mandau AND on the kampilan, although they are brass hilted (T'boli tok similarities also?)
While I'm familiar with the concept of independent parallel evolution, both in weapons and in nature, there seem to be far to many such between Assam,Taiwan and the Philippines for this to be likely, made even more notable for the fact that they are hopscotched accross a wide geographic area with nothing similar in the areas in between or nearby.
An annecdote was related here recently also about an extreme similarity in a Philippine dialect to one in Malaysia, mutually intelligible.
My apologies for obsessing, but it appears to me that there is a definite correlation that is being poo-pooed simply because it hasn't been brought forth by an expert.....I've attached side by side photos of a kuki dao and a mandau, to illustrate both the spikelet on the blade spines and the hair adornment on the hilts (both also found on the kamilon, an obvious borneo/Philippine connection), while excellent photographs of hinalung and pinahig hilts and scabards are to be found in the EEW source homepage in the treatise there on same, also for excellent comparison.


[This message has been edited by Conogre (edited 01-28-2002).]

IP: Logged

Scott Ramirez
Member
posted 09-27-2004 18:51     Click Here to See the Profile for Scott Ramirez   Click Here to Email Scott Ramirez     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
http://home.earthlink.net/~sk_ramirez/

[This message has been edited by Andrew (edited 09-27-2004).]

IP: Logged

Andrew
EEWRS Staff
posted 09-27-2004 21:13     Click Here to See the Profile for Andrew   Click Here to Email Andrew     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Welcome to the forum, Scott. I've edited your link, as your photo-hosting site does not seem to support direct linking.

Andrew

IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Ethnographic Edged Weapons Resource Site | Privacy Statement

Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of a nonexclusive license for display here.

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47d